Comments on: Saddam’s execution

By: Cupid

Cupid — Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:15:51 +0000

A sual thlak m mai a, duh leh damcung lungin tan tir tur alom..ka khongaih reuh tlatssss

By: myself

myself — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 02:50:53 +0000

There is no better example of US double standards than the fates of Augusto Pinochet of Chile and Saddam Hussein of Iraq. Pinochet was responsible for the killings and disappearances of many more people than Saddam. But not once did the US say or do anything about it because Pinochet – to use the colourful phrase of a former US President with reference to another US-backed dictator – ‘may be a son of a bitch but he is our son of a bitch’.

That Saddam Hussein was a cruel dictator is not denied. But it may be noted that Saddam invaded Iran in 1980 at the instigation of the US in order to disrupt the Khomeini revolution.

He did kill many secessionist Kurds but it was aimed at maintaining the territorial integrity of Iraq – in much the same manner as the Indian State ‘kills’ separatist Kashmiri and Naga militants or Lincoln ‘killed’ the secessionist Confederates during the US Civil War. By this logic, the head of any State can be hanged.

Shouldn’t Bush and Blair, who are responsible for the deaths of 700,000 innocent Iraqi civilians, hang? I promise to become an ardent theist if this happens!

A nice article by Tariq Ali.

Report this comment

By: methinks

methinks — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:43:07 +0000

that son of a BUSH said , ”path to democracy”??? my ass…………..
he shud rather wipe the mist on his mirrror so he can c clearly who he is………………. am not an advocate or mr hussein or his regime whatsoever but wht kinda crap is this ?????? and regrgdng whthr he is involved directly or indirectly , he is still the man to say the last word in these rulings , no ???
kho nge , ”sualna nei lo cuan deng hmasa roh se” ( i knw this is not the exact line) tih te kha ?????

Report this comment

By: superstrr

superstrr — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:10:09 +0000

Kalpah deuhin ka chhiara – Sandman’s execution tiin kan chhiar chuh..ka phu zok.

An khaihlum tur lai kah TV ka en, ka rap in ka nun a ti hrehom vek. Soi pui mai tur an om si lova, Maimawm ka kan msg top..hrehom

Report this comment

By: xiii

xiii — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:39:59 +0000

ka pu sadam chu aw,,,,,, SADAMA ni mah se a SA a DAM ta lo ………. Poi t pawh an om ve tho ang…………..

Report this comment

By: lyin`eyes

lyin`eyes — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:39:35 +0000

saddam thihdan kha man khopmai… hlauhhmel in aom lo. mahse nia khongaihthlak e.

Report this comment

By: Midian

Midian — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 08:24:18 +0000

Bush-a hi a term han tawp phot mai se…zia mai ang..ti te hi chuan WW III a chawk chhuak mai ang tihte poh ka hlauthong e

Report this comment

By: myself

myself — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:16:15 +0000

i agreed with “maimawm” the founding father of US are religious person…..

a substantial of them are protestant who migrate to US due to their religious belief….and a number of jews bussiness man/artisans also migrate from spain and other european countries to escape persecution from catholic ruler of that time, and this entrepreneurs are the one who laid the foundation of US economy………

but the present US society may not have that much god fearing which their parent used to have….even there is a lot of criticism in their so called “corporate preacher”……….but what i found disgusting is the treatment meted out to previous ruler of a country… tomorrow saudi king can face the same thing, iran ruler also can face the same thing………

Report this comment

By: Technical^^Punk

Technical^^Punk — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:06:06 +0000

HA ha! Tluangte, Mithi te chu anmahni mithi ten lo vui rawh se tih a ni kha. Kumthar a ni tawh a, nunthar in, local in tawh lovin a sen chi hlir in tawh tur.

Report this comment

By: ChesterchaZ

ChesterchaZ — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:54:38 +0000

Technical^^Punk chu leh!! teh duah che chuan, i va danglam ta ve. Chat room nen i va in ang ta lo ve.

Report this comment