Comments on: Debate | Working Women vs. Housewives

By: rk_3184

rk_3184 — Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:12:46 +0000

“i think women should not just sit at home with all the certificates she has earned…” hat was a comment from my fren Kv Belho,an Angami from Nagaland.
I think he is right tosome extend….but i truly and from the bottom of my heart don’t think he is completly right. Yeah!!! If i were to have a wife, i would certainly like someone who is earned and also would really love her more if she can provide me my needs….cause i’m a born MCP……

Report this comment

By: SkiznOd

SkiznOd — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 09:08:14 +0000

I missed ‘to’ twice! …….

Report this comment

By: SkiznOd

SkiznOd — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 08:23:19 +0000

The actual experience of a married life esp. with kids, may change your outlook/opinion on a broader sense.

We are, by nature, ‘Selfish” and being selfish does influence a lot of our decision-making. A lot depends on our economic background too.

A ‘Wife’ may choose to work (inlcuding self-employment) out of her own passion for the line of work, or may be working simply to make ends meet.

For me, I would rather have maximum involvement of both parents in bringing up their children. Here, I believe the role of the mother is more intense and her involvement (or non-involvement) is more likely have a stronger impact on the child’s development.

Fairly menial chores at home could be left to domestic servants, if one can afford them (If you can’t, get help from relatives!).

There are lots of non-working mothers who spend more time for social activities (which soon becomes ‘obligations’) compared to the time they spend with their children. For children, any time spent with parents is quality time (except in certain severe cases where the parents are inebriated and are prone to display unpleasant behaviour etc)

My point being, a mother should work if she has to/wants to but should try spend as much time she can with her kids.
If her commitment(s) at work should in any way hamper her child’s mental/emotional/physical development, I suggest she quit her job instead of sending the child off to a shrink.

The role of the mother cannot quite be substituted by the father.

Well, it gets even more complicated with same sex marriages!!

Etc.,

Report this comment

By: oouhh

oouhh — Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:26:26 +0000

ehem

Report this comment

By: J

Wed, 07 Feb 2007 03:30:49 +0000

life10, Goldy usually writes stuff online in secret code cause even the walls have eyes on his wide world web. So when he says no he usually means YES!!!

Just a lil trade secret there

Report this comment

By: myself

myself — Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:09:36 +0000

germany a survey an neih a……70% personal clerk anga thawk , hmeichhe pasal nei ho in an boss te nen sex an hmang tih te ania………………news report ania a dik nge dik lo chu a hriat chuang loh a……. an news paper hralh hnem khan an tum ber chu ani dawn bawk sia……….

mahse “monotony” chu ni thleng lo se la lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Report this comment

By: myself

myself — Tue, 06 Feb 2007 18:06:10 +0000

life10 u meant “monogamy or monotony?” lolzzzzzzzzzzz plizz clarify ur solid stand………hehehehhe

Goldmember ” in old testament all the patriach have sex with more than one woman in the bible except Isaac”……….it is there in the bible……………..but those are in old testament and not in new testament………..
we can not compare our society with the society who made the ajanta cave sculpture……………………..!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Report this comment

By: life10

life10 — Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:52:33 +0000

whew!!! thats a relief!! lolzz….so we can remain good frens then? without me scared of u eyeing my big butt muahh sweetheart

Report this comment

By: Goldmember

Goldmember — Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:34:27 +0000

um no.. im just diverging from the topic since u seemed to associate Christianity with monogamy… im jus pointing out that in Biblical times Bigamy was not frowned upon.
even if u wer the last woman on earth and the future of the human race depended on it..i wudnt marry you.