Comments on: INS Vikramaditya- India aircraft carrier thar

By: Freaky

Freaky — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:44:39 +0000

923 ft. a sei (football field let 3 vel), 195ft a zau (football field vang lam ang vel)a zau lai berah. Titanic ai khan a lian zawk fee a ni. Titanic kha chu 790ft. vela sei a ni.

Report this comment

By: meroby

meroby — Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:50:27 +0000

van bon ve aw… kan pa chu a awm vung awm sia.. phone pawn an biak tlang theih loh..

Report this comment

By: meroby

meroby — Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:46:46 +0000

hmm,, bon rem rem ve aw…

Report this comment

By: Dr John

Dr John — Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:38:39 +0000

Ţha ţha

Report this comment

By: Awmtea Leo Khiangte

Awmtea Leo Khiangte — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 16:05:46 +0000

A va bawn rem rem ve. A chanchin hriat belh zel ka chak hle mai.

Report this comment

By: Sihtea

Sihtea — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 14:31:11 +0000

A tha e. Mi ram neih ang a piang
chu neih ve mai tur.

Report this comment

By: kilung

kilung — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:25:13 +0000

Tlem in a Sipai lam deuh ten ralthuam,in venna lam an ngaigtuah laiin a mipui tam zawk lah in Vai vawm bak an ngaihtuah si lo a.. Buaithlak ani e.

Report this comment

By: Khuangpu

Khuangpu — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:01:32 +0000

China hi a thu tala ngam tur hruaitu kan mamawh. Modi hi a zia ang chu.

Report this comment

By: H.Vangchhia

H.Vangchhia — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 10:41:48 +0000

China tan a kawlh ngam teuh lo. Arunachalah pawh an duh hun hunah ramri an rawn kan a lawm le. Tawang khuaah pawh a khaw mihring aia tam India sipai an awm chung pawhin “tik” pawh an ti ngam love, an tih thin kha mawle.

Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses in a chhuah, ‘India has two realistic policy options’ a tihah te hian a ngam loh zia a lang chiangin ka hria.

Dawih aw:
First, India must clearly state that while it has no offensive military desires, or a wish for any armed conflict with China, its defensive capabilities are optimal to deter any Chinese military move into its territory. Building military infrastructure in Arunachal Pradesh adds credibility to the country’s conventional ‘deterrence’ posture. Through such defensive postures, India ‘signals’ not only its commitment to defend Arunachal Pradesh in case of a Chinese military invasion but also ensures that China clearly understands that India’s defensive force structures are credible.

Second, India should continue to negotiate with China on the border dispute within the framework Agreement signed between the two countries on April 11, 2005. In this context, the establishment of border management institutional mechanism towards the end of this year will be beneficial in resolving difficult issues pertaining to the disputed border in a structured way, thereby creating institutional memory for future reference.

The India-China territorial dispute in the eastern sector, pending resolution for decades together, is not an intractable issue. It can be resolved. While India’s current moves to defend its territory against Chinese aggression is warranted, the best way forward to resolve the issue with China is through a mechanism of dialogue and confidence-building.

https://www.idsa.in/idsacomment.....ami_181111

Report this comment

By: Sony

Sony — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:25:57 +0000

China lehh Pakistan tan han kawlh hrak phawt mai sela.

Report this comment