![Nikum lama mi kan modify [resizing & reanimation]](https://misual.life/wp-content/themes/misual/images/banners/xmas-banners5.gif "Nikum lama mi kan modify [resizing & reanimation]")
Tunlai chu India ram titi tling chu Barkha Dutt leh Radia te phone inbiakna an lo tap chungchang hi ani. An inbiakna ngaithla tawh leh text chhiar kan nih fur ka ring. Sawithui lo mai ila in hre vek zawk ang. Hetiang phone tap kaihhnawih ang chi ah hian Supreme Court thu lo tihtluk tawh tarlanna leh mithiam te ziak (comment) ka han dah lang ange -
“The tapping seems to be in direct violation of several decisions of the Supreme Court, and against a wide range of opinion from all quarters. Even leaving aside the early Supreme Court decisions of 19643 and 19754 in criminal law, and later ones on privacy in banking5 (2005); medical issues6 (specifically, AIDS; 1998); and narcoanalysis7 (2010), there are two decisions of 19948 and 19979 that specifically deal with a situation like the present one. In the 1994 decision10, the Supreme Court said:
(1) The right to privacy is implicit in the right to life and liberty guaranteed to the citizens of this country by Article 21. It is a “right to be let alone”. A citizen has a right to safeguard the privacy of his own, his family, marriage, procreation, motherhood, child-bearing and education among other matters. None can publish anything concerning the above matters without his consent—whether truthful or otherwise and whether laudatory or critical. If he does so, he would be violating the right to privacy of the person concerned and would be liable in an action for damages. Position may, however, be different, if a person voluntarily thrusts himself into controversy or voluntarily invites or raises a controversy.
On its own, this should have been enough. But the 1997 case11 deals specifically with phone-taps (under the Indian Telegraph Act12). The judgement says:
17. We have, therefore, no hesitation in holding that right to privacy is a part of the right to “life” and “personal liberty” enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution. Once the facts in a given case constitute a right to privacy, Article 21 is attracted. The said right cannot be curtailed “except according to procedure established by law”.
18. The right to privacy—by itself—has not been identified under the Constitution. As a concept it may be too broad and moralistic to define it judicially. Whether right to privacy can be claimed or has been infringed in a given case would depend on the facts of the said case. But the right to hold a telephone conversation in the privacy of one’s home or office without interference can certainly be claimed as “right to privacy”. Conversations on the telephone are often of an intimate and confidential character. Telephone conversation is a part of modern man’s life. It is considered so important that more and more people are carrying mobile telephone instruments in their pockets. Telephone conversation is an important facet of a man’s private life. Right to privacy would certainly include telephone conversation in the privacy of one’s home or office. Telephone-tapping would, thus, infract Article 21 of the Constitution of India unless it is permitted under the procedure established by law.
19. Right to freedom of speech and expression is guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. This freedom means the right to express one’s convictions and opinions freely by word of mouth, writing, printing, picture, or in any other manner. When a person is talking on telephone, he is exercising his right to freedom of speech and expression. Telephone-tapping unless it comes within the grounds of restrictions under Article 19(2) would infract Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court specifically required guidelines to be framed by government. That hasn’t been done, at least not in the narrowly tailored way the Supreme Court intended. For the government to subvert a decision of the Supreme Court like this is monstrous, and more so in the context of what the Supreme Court calls an unconstitutional infringement of the right to life. If there is an exception, it is only in the case of a “public emergency” or “public safety”. What public emergency and what public safety justified these tapes? It must follow, necessarily, that the tapes—even if “authorised” by some bureaucrat—are entirely illegal.”
Similar Posts:
- Babus’ assets can be made public
- Ayodhya Verdict vangin SMS khaihlak
- US puts India on “Watch List”
- Help Please!
- Thai court orders Thaksin arrest
December 3rd, 2010 at 12:33 pm
December ni FIRST atanga chhiara ni hnihna 3rd. Dec. a lo ni leh ta der mai. Chhiar tan ang.
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 12:36 pm
Parag. 2 lek turah ka ngai a….
Sei hle mai
Ka chhiar thiam a, mahse a awmzia ka hre lo! :mrgreen:
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 12:42 pm
Voice call recording software ka hmang reng a. In & outgoing calls reng reng auto-record a ni. Kan inbiakna zawng zawng kha a play leh theih. Mahni in ‘tapping’ a ni ber ang chu
Confidential calls ah chuan ka phone hi a hman hawh chi vak loh vang
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 12:44 pm
Mizorama phone tam tak pawh hi hetianga tih hi awma ring an awm tran tlats
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 1:01 pm
inbiak don chuan tawng kher lovin in SMS char char a him zoks dawn a ni chu :))
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 1:19 pm
Ka lo hre hauhlo a, hei India ram titi tling chu ka titi alo la tling velo a nih hi maw le
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 1:20 pm
A awmzia ka va man chiahlo e..
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 1:22 pm
@Zoaram Genesis #3: Voice recording Software hi eng file nge le, ka duh ve hle mai, ka phone Sonyerickson K530i ang chi hian a hmang thei ve ang em aw?
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 1:37 pm
Hetiang Barkha especially dud te ang audience/interviewees te aia opinionated, inla celebrity lutuk, chapo si, mahni point of view ngai pawimawh ber, an thil sawi sensitive leh sensitive pawh thliar hrang lo ho hi chu BANG VEK RAWH SE
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 1:47 pm
Android hmang tan chuan Android Market ah free call recording software download tur a tam mai
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 2:20 pm
@pimpom: symbian ho hian apps tha an ngah ber. Ka hman veleh lo en ang e.
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 2:59 pm
Zualbonez chu i rawn rap ani maw? A rhyme a dik thlap mai a…
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 4:13 pm
@pompom spycall tiin han gugul teh. cuan i ph mil tur i zawng mai don nia
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 4:20 pm
Bush copy hmel ve
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 4:53 pm
Nu tal nasa ve tak chu ni……..
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 5:07 pm
First ho hi, in intithei thin em mai….
Han comment tur pawh ka hre ve lo e. Ka hul tlat vawiin chu.
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 5:38 pm
Nizana Mami Varte nena kan inbiakna an lo tap vaih chuan naktukah ka chhe vek a ni mai.
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 6:12 pm
Engmah tak2 hi ‘him’ a awm tawh lo a nih ber hi, tunlai khawvel leh khua velah hian…!!
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 6:49 pm
Kalo hre ve miah hleinem, a bengvar thlak khawpmai. An inbiakna ah chuan eng tak sawi ang maw…
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 6:57 pm
Phone sex hmang thin ho tan ava thalo duh awmve
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 7:27 pm
kan mizoram journalist te hi enge an an ve o?miss radia-i poh a kuang lo a nawr na lamah a hmingchhe ta hrep a,,,a citizens right to know te poh hi poimoh ve tho lo mo???
[Report abuse]
December 3rd, 2010 at 11:47 pm
He thil hi a controversial ve riau chuan ka hria…
Entirnan, phone tap atanga information leak out ro ro ah, mi pawimawh leh thuneitu tena thil thalo tak an sawi tih leak out leh mi phone se hmang lai tih leak out kha DAN hin a thruai rual anih chuan ethics ang zawng pawhin a dik thei chiahlo… heihi DAN famkih theihlohna tenen pawh a in zulin ka hria, thil dang dang ah pawh…
[Report abuse]
December 4th, 2010 at 10:47 am
Phaia ka awm lai khan tum khat chu ka Phone an Tapped (ngai thla ru ) ve thin a, kan hrechiang si a, an hlauh deuh tur mi pakhat kan han vau tir mai a, an hlau teh a sin… kan Phone tapped-tu hi MIZO ANI LEHNGHAL A NIH CHU, A RAPTHLAK DUH KHAWP MAI. Service Provider-a Complain kan Thehluh chuan min Hrilh dan chuan “Investigation lam thil a ni e”, tiin “Sim Card kha an Clone” a, Phone kha a rawn ring hian Sim Card 2 (Phone 2)-ah a ring ta thin a nih chu!! Mahse, an Fimkhur viau a ngai thung. Kan awmna leh kan Biak meka te awmna leh Min ngaithla rutute awmna kha a environment a in-an loh chuan hriatchhuah a awl lutuk. Prepaid ka hmang si a, Ka Sim Card ka thlak ang tih an hlau lutuk khan Balance pawh min lo thun sak char char a, Sekibuhchhuak a ni ringawt mai, hahaha, Thla 3 chhung chu Naia Khat pawh Thun lovin Phone hi duhtawkin ka hmang.
[Report abuse]