Misual tamtak sakhua lam kan tui tan riau a. Ka lehkhabu chhiar lai tlem te ka rawn bel kai ve mai mai e.. Mizo tawng a leh ka tum a, mahse ka let nalh thiam lo em a, a ngai ang angin ka lo bel tawp. Ngaihtuah a ti tam ka tih tawh kha..! Lu a hai duh bawk…!! Hei hi lo chhiar mek ula.. a dang tlemte ka rawn ti leh ang..!! He Lekhabu ziaktupa hi Prabir Ghosh, General secretary of the Indian Rationalist and Scientific Thinking Association a ni e.
Prabir a chanchin tlemte:- Social Evils duh lova a crusade na ah hian 1980′s atang khan vawi 20 vel lai a nun lak tuma beih ani tawh a. “Humanism” hi dan hmanga (legal right) religion pakhat a hman thei hi a thil tihthat tamtak zinga pakhat chauh ani e. Ghosh-a leh Science and Rationalists’ Association of India chuan mi tu pawh trick tel miah lova supernatural power nei in ti a proof thei hnenah US$62,500 pek an in huam ani.
“Kristian/Hindu/Islam/Buddhist/HnamSakhua” ka sawisel lo ania..!!” IPC 295A hmangin no_nick-a kan khing dawn em ni?” te in lo ti palh ange.. 
( Being sarcastic… 
) . Aw.. Hei le…!! Uluk deuhin in lo chhiar ve dawn nia..
Can you prove that God does not exist? That astrology is bogus?’ Such questions are very common. The answer is equally simple. I will narrate an incident to explain the fallacy here. It was 23rd of January, 1990. There was a seminar in Krishnanagar Town Hall, about 200 km from Kolkata. A debate, ‘Astrology versus Science’ was arranged, for which I was invited. Many astrologers and tantriks (practitioners of Tantra, a Hindu cult) were present. It was there that these two missiles were hurled at me. The audience was visibly thrilled.
Before going into details, I confessed to the gathering that I was not omniscient, and was not always able to explain whatever I felt. So many things happen in our lives, the causes of which we cannot always fathom. For example, I have noticed that whenever I jumped three times consecutively on one spot, I grew in height. I went into great details, addressing the eager crowd. “I can even show you. If I skipped hard, springing on my two feet, I gained at least 3 inches in height. I don’t know why or how it happens”.
The crowd started fidgeting uneasily, whispering to each other. There was a pole of some kind standing at one corner of the ground. It was probably meant for hoisting flag. I pointed at the pole and called one of the tantrik yogis to come and check what I was trying to show. On my instruction, he marked my height against the pole as I stood there. There was pin-drop silence. I skipped three times and came to the pole and asked Mr. yogi to check my height.
I heard whispers from the public- ‘there, he’s become taller!’ ‘Yes, yes, it’s true’ etc. The yogi checked my height. He checked again. Then again. Surprised, he exclaimed, ‘No!’ ‘It’s the same; you have not grown any…’ Now it was my turn to be surprised. ‘No? How come? You mean I haven’t?’ I blurted out. ‘Have you measured properly?’ With confidence, the tantrik faced the audience and said loudly, ‘anyone can come and check. His height is still the same; he hasn’t grown even by half an inch.’ I apologized, ‘well, I’m sorry. May be today it didn’t work, but I tell you: believe me, it really happens at times. Many times I have gained a few inches and have come back to normal within a few minutes.
I don’t know what happened today’ etc. The crowd started humming in dissatisfaction. Some of them protested in disbelief. ‘Could you explain how it happens?’ I started again. But this time the yogi was adamant. He shouted angrily, ‘what is there to explain? You could not show the trick. You failed. First you do it, then comes the question of explaining.’ Meekly I said ‘Please have faith in me; today I failed, but I will prove it next time. Can’t you believe me?’ ‘Sorry, Mr.Ghosh. We cannot trust you. I don’t expect anyone with a reasoning mind to believe in your absurd claim.’ ‘You mean to say I’m a liar? One failure makes me a cheat? Can you prove that my claim was false; that I do not grow in height whenever I jumped three times?’ It was my turn to get annoyed.
The yogi tantrik could not contain his anger any longer. ‘How can you ask us to explain something which you could not show in the first place? It is your job to prove what you claim. It is the duty of the claimant to prove what he claims, and not the other way round.’
‘Ah! Lovely,’ now I cheered and turned towards the gathering intently enjoying the drama. ‘This is exactly what I wanted to say. It is always the responsibility of the believer to bring out the proof in support of his belief. Whether it is about the existence of god or the infallibility of ancient texts like astrology, it is the primary duty of those who claim, to bring sufficient documentary proof in support of their claim. After testing and cross-verification, the rational human mind would accept or reject the claims’.The crowd exploded in laughter and loud applause. I knew I could get home my point.
Similar Posts:
- Jesus did not die on cross, says scholar
- In singer ngaihsan ber kha SATANIST ANIA AW! – Part IV
- BMW X5 Manipur sorkar in lei!
- Boomarang at Someplace Else and The Park
- IIPM a Scam?
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:07 am
einch! lehkhabu inang te kan chhiar vel..
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:23 am
A sawi chu sakhua ani.
Krista zuitu ten sakhua kan sawi lo. Thudik kan sawi ani. Kan Pathian hi min siamtu chu ani a, ama ta kan ni.
Lal Isuan ‘Ka ram chu he khawvel ami ani lo’ a tihna chhan chu, hmuh theih thil a innghat te tan Isua Lal ram an chungah a thleng thei lo.
Science leh finna hi a siamtu ‘Jehova’ ropuizia tilang tu mai anni. Vawiina kan hriat loh tam tak hi nakin ah kan hre chho dawn. Kan hriat tam poh leh kan hriat tlem zia a lang chauh vang. Chuvang chu ani Pathian chu ‘Omniscient’ – engkim hria, science chunga Lalpa anih na chhan.
A then pawh kan hre thei lo. He lui kam atang hian. Amah ringtu te thinlung ah leh Lalpa a inpuanna te ah erawh chuan thlamuanna leh beiseina a pe si thin.
Kraws thu chu boral mekte tan chuan atna ani sia. Keini chhandam mekte tan erawh chuan Pathian thiltihtheihna a ni zawk.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:23 am
Einch! english-lushai dictionary nen chhiar ang
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:36 am
Sakhaw dang chu ka sawi thei lo va, kan Pathian hi chuan fiah a duh lo.But we feels His presence and sees His Love
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:39 am
He post chuan article pakhat ka chhiar min ti hre chhuak..
A thui viau na a…a in zawm nalh em mai ka’n post thuai teh ang….
“Let me explain the problem science has with Jesus Christ.”
The atheist professor of philosophy pauses before his class and then asks
one of his new students to stand. “You’re a Christian, aren’t you, son?”
“Yes sir,” the student says.
“So you believe in God?”
“Absolutely.”
“Is God good?”
“Sure! God’s good.”
“Is God all-powerful? Can God do anything?”
“Yes.”
“Are you good or evil?”
“The Bible says I’m evil.”
The professor grins knowingly. “Aha! The Bible!” He considers for a moment.
“Here’s one for you. Let’s say there’s a sick person over here and you can cure him. You can do it. Would you help him? Would you try?”
“Yes sir, I would.”
“So you’re good…!”
“I wouldn’t say that.”
“But why not say that? You’d help a sick and maimed person if you could.
Most of us would if we could. But God doesn’t.”
The student does not answer, so the professor continues.
“He doesn’t, does he? My brother was a Christian who died of cancer, even
though he prayed to Jesus to heal him. How is this Jesus good? Hmmm? Can
you answer that one?”
The student remains silent.
“No, you can’t, can you?” the professor says. He takes a sip of water from
the glass on his desk to give the student time to relax.
“Let’s start again, young fella. Is God good?”
“Err…yes,” the student says.
“Is Satan good?”
The student doesn’t hesitate on this one. “No.”
“Then where does Satan come from?”
The student falters. “From…God…”
“That’s right. God made Satan, didn’t he? Tell me, son. Is there evil in this world?”
“Yes, sir.”
“Evil’s everywhere, isn’t it? And God did make everything, correct?”
“Yes.”
“So who created evil?”
Again, the student has no answer.
“Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things, do they exist in this world?”
The student squirms on his feet. “Yes.”
“So who created them?”
The student does not answer again, so the professor repeats his question.
“Who created them?”
There is still no answer.
Suddenly the lecturer breaks away to pace in front of the classroom. The class is mesmerized.
“Tell me,” he continues. “Do you believe in Jesus Christ, son?”
The student’s voice betrays him and cracks. “Yes, professor. I do.”
The old man stops pacing. “Science says you have five senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?”
“No sir. I’ve never seen Him.”
“Then tell us if you’ve ever heard your Jesus?”
“No, sir. I have not.”
“Have you ever felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus or smelt your Jesus? Have you ever had any sensory perception of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter.”
“No, sir, I’m afraid I haven’t.”
“Yet you still believe in him?”
“Yes.”
“According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your God doesn’t exist. What do you say to that, son?”
“Nothing,” the student replies. “I only have my faith.”
“Yes, faith,” the professor repeats. “And that is the problem science has with God. There is no evidence, only faith.”
The student stands quietly for a moment, before asking a question of His own.
“Professor, is there such thing as heat?”
“Yes,” the professor replies. “There’s heat.”
“And is there such a thing as cold?”
“Yes, son, there’s cold too.”
“No sir, there isn’t.”
The professor turns to face the student, obviously interested. The room suddenly becomes very quiet. The student begins to explain.
“You can have lots of heat, even more heat, super-heat, mega-heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat, but we don’t have anything called ‘cold’.
We can hit 458 degrees below zero, which is no heat, but we can’t go any further after that. There is no such thing as cold; otherwise we would be able to go colder than -458 degrees. You see, sir, cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold.
Heat we can measure in thermal units because heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it.”
Silence across the room. A pen drops somewhere in the classroom, sounding like a hammer.
“What about darkness, professor. Is there such a thing as darkness?”
“Yes,” the professor replies without hesitation. “What is night if it isn’t darkness?”
“You’re wrong again, sir. Darkness is not something; it is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light…but if you have no light constantly you have nothing and it’s called darkness, isn’t it? That’s the meaning we use to define the word.
In reality, darkness isn’t. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn’t you?”
The professor begins to smile at the student in front of him. This will be a good semester.
“So what point are you making, young man?”
“Yes, professor. My point is, your philosophical premise is flawed to start with and so your conclusion must also be flawed.”
The professor’s face cannot hide his surprise this time.
“Flawed? Can you explain how?”
“You are working on the premise of duality,” the student explains. “You argue that there is life and then there’s death; a good God and a bad God.
You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure. Sir, science can’t even explain a thought. It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one. To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death
cannot exist as substantive thing. Death is not the opposite of life, just the absence of it.”
“Now tell me, professor. Do you teach your students that they evolved from monkeys?”
“If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, young man, yes, of course I do.”
“Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?”
The professor begins to shake his head, still smiling, as he realizes where the argument is going.
A very good semester indeed.
“Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavour, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you now not a scientist, but a preacher?”
The class is in uproar. The student remains silent until the commotion has subsided.
“To continue the point you were making earlier to the other student, let me give you an example of what I mean.”
The student looks around the room. “Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the professor’s brain?”
The class breaks out into laughter. “Is there anyone here who has ever heard the professor’s brain, felt
the professor’s brain, touched or smelt the professor’s brain? No one appears to have done so. So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain, with all due respect, sir. So if science says you have no brain, how can we trust your lectures, sir?”
Now the room is silent. The professor just stares at the student, his face unreadable.
Finally, after what seems an eternity, the old man answers. “I guess you’ll have to take them on faith.”
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:40 am
thilpeka fiah a rem ti thung
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:43 am
He lai facebook ‘group’ ah hian Pathian awm ring leh ring lo ho an in bei nasa thei khawp mai —–> Athiset vs Thiest https://www.facebook.com/home.p.....2372835473
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:44 am
Tunlai chu Sakhuana lam kaihhnawih kan khel nasa hle mai. Pathian awm leh awm loh chungchanga mi ropui 2 thusawi hi a tha ka ti.
When I see all the glories of the cosmos, I can’t help but believe that there is a divine hand behind it all. Albert Einstein
My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust.
But how had I got this idea of just and unjust?
A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line.
What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust?
If the whole show was bad and senseless from A to Z, so to speak, why did I, who was supposed to be part of the show, find myself in such a violent reaction against it?
… Of course I could have given up my idea of justice by saying it was nothing but a private idea of my own.
But if i did that, then my argument against God collapsed too–for the argument depended on saying the world was really unjust, not simply that it did not happen to please my fancies.
Thus, in the very act of trying to prove that God did not exist – in other words, that the whole of reality was senseless – I found I was forced to assume that one part of reality – namely my idea of justice – was full of sense.
If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never have known it was dark. Dark would be without meaning.
C.S. Lewis
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:45 am
1. Ka lo tawngtai sak ang che.
2. I thlarau kalna tur chu a va huphurhawm ve
3. Kross thu chu boral mek te tan at na a ni si a.
Heng tawngkam te hi ka hre hne tawh.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:51 am
ee,3d, ka lo tawngtaisak fan ang che. ka theihnghilh loh chuan.
T(r)ih tur dik trih hi a pa ber zawk a lo ni.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:53 am
#5 Spam Hei hi tha ka ti khawp mai. Hemi post ka hmuh chiah khan ka rilru ah alo awm nghal a, mahse comment ah i rawn dah hman a.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:55 am
Pathian hi awm lo ta se “chance” vang in ami khawvel ah mihring kan lo awm?, thingkung in oxygen an pe chhuak a, chu chu mihring in nun nan kan mamawh, chuan keini chuan carbon dioxide kan thaw chhuak chu lah chu thingkung in an nun nan an lo mamawh ve zel bawk si. Design tu chu an awm ka ring kei chuan.
Ar nge artui lo awm hmasa tih pawh hi?
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:59 am
Vai thu ziah..¡!!¡ lolzz
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 1:34 am
A sei, a tlai tawh bawk si, ka pending hrih zuai, chhiar lovin – science awmlo se Pathian hi ka ring theilo ang. Atom ka en a, universe ka en a, solar system ka en a, motion ka en a, energy ka en a mipakhat design a ni tih ka hrethiam nghal.
He post hi ka interest #1 dawn e. Vakul, Asteric, Donald,Krista,PK, Chawnghilh… heta hi rangkachak khur ka chhar e, in duh ve em?
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 1:41 am
Scholastic period vela ‘reason is the test of all truth’ an tih laite pawh min hriatchhuahtir.
Scientific rationalism hian eng tik laiin nge maw religion hi a accept ngai le?
Religion erawh chuan science hi a pawm.
A posttu/ziaktu hian Sakhua/religion a khawhtir chauh avangin Christianity-a kaihluh kher kan ba lo turah ngai ang.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 1:42 am
aaa tawngtial.. sei bawk si \o> <o/ \o/
Audio awm se..
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 1:44 am
Science hian rinna in thil a ti a, a zawng a chutah a proof/findings a hmu thin, a awm e, a ti ngot in, proof a ni e an ti nghal ngawt reng2 lo an zawn chhuah hma chu. Chutiang bawk chuan Pathian pawh hi a awm kan rin a kan zawn chuan a proof chu kan la hmu ngei ang. A proof hmuh hun erawh thihna ah a nih si hmel. Thihna hian thil tam tak a kawk thei awm e a.
.
Scientist tamtak te pawh hi an hmanhmawh lua thin a nih hmel heheheheh
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 1:49 am
Lolzzzzz.. kei ve hi !
comment #5 hi post emaw tiin ka lo chhiar ve char char a !!
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 1:51 am
A awm sa chauh zir hi Science thil tih ber a ni lovin ka lo hre ve mai2, hmuh chhuah a hi pawh hi science tho a ni. rationalist ho hi chuan an irrational a ni tih hi an in hre lo, lo ti ve ngot teh ang hehehehe
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 1:55 am
Malsta, a dik lutuk. Heng mi te hian (Pathian awm-scientifically a proof) tumtute hian Thihna an tawn hun chuan an chiang ve uarh tawh ang chu.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 2:29 am
#11 @Buizoa -Kan rilru a in ang chiah
Ka inthlahrung khawp mai-post thar a siam dawn in kan thupui chhanna atan ka it bawk sia…post thar ang ah ngaih chhunzawm mai rawh 
#18 @(¯`·._.·donald duck·._.·´¯) –
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 3:32 am
ka muhil theilo in kan bih ve zuai a, mitam tak tan chuan a interesting viau ngei ang, keini Christian te buaina turah ka ngai vaklo, kan buaina tur zawk chu tih tur/rawngbawlna tur kan la ngahzia a tilang in ka hria. Kan buai dan hi kawm kal buaisual palh ange…
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 5:14 am
Pathian awm rinlohna hi alo pian chhuah dan hi a awm ka tihpui ve thin khawp mai. Thuthlung hlui bu atanga kan en chuan mihring te suala an tluk atang khan mihring zingah Pathian a cheng tawhlo hrim hrim a (Adama kianga a awm angin). Chhungkua pakhat ko chhuak in Abrahama atang Pathian chuan a chenna tur kawng a rawn sial leh a ni tih Kristian te chuan kan zir dan a ni.
Abrahama chhungte nilo hnam dang Babulon mi te, Amor mi te, Amalek, Moab, etc. mi te biak tur in Pathian an zingah a chen ve loh avangin Nature an be deuh vek a, Nature chu Science ah hriatfiah thiamna a innghat a. Science lo chhuahna chu Pathianin a thilsiam ropuina hi a thup tak vek avangin zir alo ngai ta a ni. A hun laiin Science thiamnaah anla san loh avangin kha Natural Things kha mihringin a hriatthiamloh avangin a be taa, pathian tak a nihlohna anla hre lo hrim hrim bawk ani.
Hun alo kal zel a, Nature te chu Science in Pathian a nihloh zia alo proved chho zel a, an pathian chu a tak a nilo tih an hre telh telh a, pathiana anlo neih thin te chu a reduce tial tial a, Science in pathian annilo tih a proved zawh meuh chuan pathian a zo der a, chuta tang chuan Pathian a awmlo tih hi a lo piang chhuak ta a ni.
Big Bang theory lam kan sawi dawn chuan kan bo thui lutuk ang, he theory pawh hi Pathian paih bo thak turin a valid lo nasa lutuk.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 5:42 am
zoho-a ngaihdan hi ka lo vei ve em em tawh thin. Bible a ka Favourite quote hi Jeremiah 33:3 “Mi au la, ka chhâng ang che, thil ropui leh inthup i hriat ngai loh chu ka entir ang che.” tih hi ani a, William carey thusawi “Pathian hnenah thil ropui tak dil la, atan thil ropui tak tih tum bawk ang che” tih pawh hi ka duh em em thin.
“Mi zawng zawngin thil an tisual tawh vek a, Pathian ropuina an chang zo ta lo a ni. (Rom. 3:23)” tiin Paula chuan a ziak a.
Science hian Pathian ropui zia a hailang a, a chhan chu Pathian thil thup te anni. Mahse pianthar nan te, Pathian zawnnan te a hman theihloh thung. Pathian hriatna awm nise khawvela Science thiam zawng zawng hian an hmu tawh ang. Amah Pathian ring chunga zir in a ropuina kan hriat a belhchhah ringawt chauh a ni.
Paula hian he khawvel thiamna hmanga Pathian zawn hi a rawn vei khawp mai,
‘Mi fing finna chu ka tiboral ang a,
Remhre remhriatna chu ka paih thla ang’
tih Pathian thu ziak awmsa a Korinth khua ami te hnena a rawn interprete na chhan chiah pawh kha hei hi a ni. A example atan Science thiamna lama sang tak Greek mite a rawn hmang chiah leh nghala (1Korinth 1:18- atang hian chhiar ula chiang mai)
Science hian Pathian a prove chhuak dawn lo, thup chin a nei tlat. Tin, a hmel hmuhna pawh a nilo, a ropuina hriat chhuahna chauh a ni. Amah zawnhmuh nana a thil thlan te chu 1korinth Bung 1 ah hian a ziah vek hi.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 7:09 am
“Mi a chuan a rilruin ‘Pathian a awm lo’ a ti a”. (Sam 14, 53)
“Pathian atna ber pawh mihring aiin a fing a, Pathian chak lohna ber pawh mihring aiin a chak zawk”.(1 Kor 1:25)
Pathian awm ring lote hi an thih dawn hnaih mangan tak takah chuan Pathian awm an ring leh nge nge thin!! Mahse, an tan a tlai lutuk chawk!
Khawvel thila mifing intiten an atzia an la hmu chiang dawn khawp e.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 7:24 am
Ka tih reng kha! Kan zingah kristian nilo mai piah lamah Pathian awm pawh ring lo an in zep tul a, chutih lai a keimahni kristian satliah pawh ni lo, Full time a Pathian rawng bawl tura in buatsaih mek ten, Bible thu controversial lai ni a kan hriat lo vawrh chhuah fo hi a hrisello em em a ni. 5. Spam i ti tha lutuk. “Thim (darkness) hi a awm hranpa lo, eng a tam leh tlem a zir mai a ni” tih lai hi, Kristian Naupang Pawl chanchinbu “Naupangte thian” ah, Natpang pakhatin a ziak a, a tha ka ti tak zet. Detail zawkin i rawn tarlang a, ka va lawm em. Pathian pawh a lawm ngei ang. Lo in chhiar zauvin tan lo la sauh sauh rawh. Kan hma hi a chhah ru hle tih ka hmu khiau a nia. Arunachal University(Rajiv Gandhi University) leh NERIST zirlaite zinga thu ka sawi leh hunah ka sawi chhuak ngei ang.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 7:50 am
Theology, zu, ethnic/tribal issues. Thil dang han post teh u khai. An ninmawm zozai deuh em mai.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 8:31 am
@ 5 spam .
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 10:51 am
@3d, kypon kalo trogty pui ang che zanin ah.ka theihnghilh loh chuan
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 11:39 am
Stephen Hawkin a chuan heti hian a ziak: a sawi dik ve maw?
It was a metaphor that contained all the Gods in the different religions, but more than that, it is explained that this universal force does not have the characteristics of the Gods that humans attributed. People made up “a human-like being with whom one can have a personal relationship”. He said that, in a competition between science and religion, science will eventually win because “it works”.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 11:54 am
and,, i would give evrything i have if he can prove that God doesnt exist!
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:05 pm
Huis!Ringtu tan buaina tur a awmlo…mahse kraws thu chu boral mekte tan erawh chuan atna a ni si!!! Tunlai Mizo thalai,kum 40 hnuai lam ti teh ang,zingah hian Pathian awm ringlo,setana awm pawh ring chuanglo an tam tawh.. a bik takin mahni ngaiha fing inti riau ho zingah
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 12:38 pm
@31 zeus: dik ltk..!!
Pathian awm leh awm loh hi a prove theihloh..
A awm a nih pawn prove a awm lova.. Pathian a awmlo ti tu pawn a prove thei chuang lo..! Chuvangin mahni rin dan dan a ni mai.. Pathian awm ringtu te chuan an rinna kha a dik ah an ngai a.. reality ah enge awm tihb an hre bik lo.. chutiang bawk chuanpathian awm ringlotute pawhin a scientific reason hmangin pathian a exist lohna chhan tlem te an ngaihtuah chhuak ta a..
Hetah hian a pawimawh zawk chu rinna a ni.. Mahni rindan dan hi a nimai…!! Kristian a dik ber ti ringot mah i la, a ni kher lo..!! I rindan i rawn sawi tihna a ni zawk dawn si aa..
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 2:59 pm
College-a zir laiin, Atheist ka inti ve nasa mai a. A nghawng a na mai mai!
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 4:20 pm
Ka rilrua lolang chu Catabomb martarte tih lehkha bu a a tawplam mi (a inziah dan ka chiang lutuk tawhlo) kha a ni daih. A tawp lam a ziahnaah khaw pawnah miropui leh mi fing tak takte thlan tam tak a hmuh thu te, mahse reilo te atana ropui an ni a, tunah chuan an thlan chiah a awm tawh a ni. Chutiang deuh chuan mihringte zingah hian han in ngai ropui leh kan Pathian engkimtithei han cho mai te, Pathian a awmlo tivel te hi anlo la piang zel dawn. Mahse chung mite pawh chu engtikah emaw chuan vaivutah anla chang ang a kan PATHIAN erawh chatuan chatuanin a ropui zual zel dawn zawk a ni. Beatles vanglaia Japan rama chapo taka ISUA aia lar nia insawi te kha khawiah nge an awm tak, an thih atanga kum reilo teah an chanchin pawh history-ah bak hmuh tur a awm tawh lovang. Chupawh thangtharten an ngaisang tehchiam tawh lovang. Tun atanga kum 100-ah phei chuan tuman an hretawh kher lovang. Mihring te hi ngaihtuah chian chuan nep tak kan ni. Chuti chunga PATHIAN a awmlo han tih vel te chu an nep hlawm em mai.
Tin, hetiang ho hian example fahrah te te hmang a thiltih an ching a, a chhanna tawk te te hi chu alo awm ve zel mai @5 ang te khi. A chhanna dikber erawh rorel saka an awm hunah anla hmu ang, mahse chumi hunah chuan a tlai tawh dawn a ni.
@3d-Tawngtaisak chu iva ning awm ve, keiin a lawmawm kalo tihthin lai a. Tawngtaisaktu kan nei hi a lawmawm a ni.
Report this comment
June 22nd, 2011 at 4:25 pm
@33, No-nick,prove lam chu sawi tawh teh suh. ISUA ngei he khawvelah a rawn kal tawh a, a thih hnuah pawh mi tamtak hnenah a inlar a, tun thlengin kan zingah a la cheng tih hi ila hrelovem ni? Chuti chunga in awihlo tlat mai hi a pawi hle mai.
Report this comment