36% of scientists at NASA are Indians: Govt survey
The extent to which desis have made an impact in the US was reeled off in the Rajya Sabha — as many as 12% scientists and 38% doctors in the US are Indians, and in NASA, 36% or almost 4 out of 10 scientists are Indians.
- TOI
Similar Posts:
- External Affairs Minister hlui K.Natwar Singh Congress Party-in hnawtchhuak
- When was the last time you phoned your mother?
- Thlawhna cancel + Airport MI
- Mizos, as per the survey, are the heaviest smokers in India
- Kuthnathawktu te Pual -Vaihmarcha
March 13th, 2008 at 5:32 am
“Lot-a te chhung zat pawh an awm dawn em ni le”
- Tian statistic hi chu Pathian in a hria.
Report this comment
March 13th, 2008 at 5:56 am
H.Vangchhia says: “Mizoram Mizo inhlawh duh te hi Burma Mizo ang hian assylum/refugee te hi Burma ID hmangin dil ve hlawm se, atam thei ang ber US ah hian inhlawh ila.”
2003 ni ta in ka hria. Mizo artist team USA ah an zin tumin mi thenkhat an awm fual a, Burma lama atanga pem Pastor thenkhattten “llegal immigration” an sawimawi mauh mai kha kha Mizo tlangval tam tak ngaihdan a lo nilo nasa mai a. misul.com pian hma lam ani. Kan inhnial chiam kha. Tunah pawh Mizorama Mizo tam zawk chuan US dan bawhchhiat chu tha an tih ka ring lo. Mahse Myanmar lama kan hnampuite dinhmun khi a rapthlak lutuk a, an tan chuan tihawm reng ani.
‘Crime’ leh ‘sin’ hi kan ngaihfin thin ani. Kristian dan ani em ? tih lam ni lovin, US immigration Act, Indian Penal Code(IPC), etc kan bawhchhia em ? tih lama sawi zawk tur ani. India pawh, US pawh Bible emaw Quran, hmanga rorel ani lo.
Report this comment
March 13th, 2008 at 7:47 am
A va in thlahrun awm ta sawt ve. I huat kan rin loh teh reng nen. A pawi e.
“Or, as Drewnowksi was reported as saying in a press release:
It’s a question of money…On a per calorie basis, diets composed of whole grains, fish, and fresh vegetables and fruits are far more expensive than refined grains, added sugars and added fats. It’s not a question of being sensible or silly when it comes to food choices, it’s about being limited to those foods that you can afford…People are not poor by choice and they become obese primarily because they are poor.”
source: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/469027
No offense… mahse question/coment khat: hnam then i stereotype dan kha a va negative ve.
Maenga chu, restaurant tha ah a khat tawk a kal i tlin sia, i lo khilai zeuh zeuh mai dawn em ni? Washinton DC in hlat vak loh chuan, Citronelle Restaurant tih ka rawt e. : )
Report this comment
March 13th, 2008 at 8:02 am
Guys, there must be a seperate section for discussion on health food. Otherwise let us keep the debate covilized, avoiding racial or ethnic stereotypes. Asians amy see African-Americans as laid back, but remember, they are good in music and sports.
Report this comment
March 13th, 2008 at 2:30 pm
Thirkut said..
Obesity mi rethei zing an a tam na chan em em chu, an chaw ei vang a nia, cheap leh fast foods ah trans fat leh saturated fats a tam bik thin a, chaw tha leh chaw hrisel an efford thei bok si lo….
va mak ve le US lam chu..thatchhiat vang a ni zawk lo maw? fulltime hna thawk tan chuan chaw hrisel chu aei ve thei lutuk…hrawk duh zawng leh a awl sam lam an ei thin vangin an thau a ni deuh ber ee..hre reng si mahni in control tum loh vang liau liau zawk a ni kei New Zealand lam experience a tang chuan..ka ti teh ang..
Report this comment
March 13th, 2008 at 4:35 pm
Thirkut: haw love a…a media leh thildang atanga hriat hi chu mitin tan a applicable lo fo tlat alawm:) Engpawh nise, DC chu midum khawpui ania…Georgetown te a nih ngawt loh chuan kal amanhla lo reuh lutuk a…:)
Thau chhan i sawi retheih vang kha ka ei lutuk lo deuh hlek alawm mawle. Mi hausa thau ka hre ve nial nual bawk si a…. junk food an puh ber a, tet lai atanga ei than tawh ei lova an awm thiam loh (ngawlvei) ang ve deuh te pawh aniang chu…felony neih vang emaw, thatchhiat vanga hna hmulo te an nih ngawt loh chuan junk food lovin tupawh a nun theih ka ring a ni. State rethei ho a khawsa te an nih chuan ka hrelo le.
Vladimir: Ka Mizo puite ka duhsak/idea ka pek va na ah ka ngai a, tul leh tha tiin ka idea kha lo chhawr se, tha ti lovin chhawr lo se a ni mai, tiraw.
2003 ni lovin 2002 zawk ah alawm an lo zin kha chu…mahse i sawi chambang tur anga sawm tih kha (dan lova awm ruk) chu ka pawm lemlo kei chuan. Ka hriat chin ah chuan, an visa a thih hma in haw leh vek se, tichuan khita atangin rawn apply nawn leh se tiin thurawn pek an nih bak ah an intiamkam (written) nghe nghe niin ka hria. keini pawn Daduhi te, Pi Bawichhingpuii fanu Dr.Rinteii leh Liandingpuii kan mikhual ve a, chutiang chanchin kan hrelo reng reng…bak ah in hmu khawm reng kan nia, sawi a awm ka hrelo…typical Mizo rumor a ni maithei. A chhan chu nidang/kum dang zel ah Mizo dang sponsor an harsat phah bak ah mualpho a hlauhawm vang te pawh a ni thei ang. Chuti chung chuan mi pathum an tlanbo/thepru ta hram zawk a nih kha. Midang erawh chu an haw a an mahni in an rawn chhuk nawn leh mai…ka fak takzet a ni khami te kha.
Report this comment
March 13th, 2008 at 5:23 pm
@H.Vangchhia, Mizoram Burma refugee ang a ram dang kal chu an awm ve nuk a sin. Tunah pawh UNHCR-ah refugee a an pawm tawh Mizoram mi an awm nual. Burma ID neih khe a tul lo. Mahse sawi tam vak chi a ni lo, Burma refugee an tam em2 a, UNHCR a in register thei lo tam tak an awm a, kan unau dang te leh hnam dang hoin an hriat chuan buaina nasa tak a chhuak thei.
@muantea, “a tam ber Burma atang a refugee CHHUANLAM a Asylum hmu”
i tih hi, “CHHUANLAM” i tih tak hi ,” ni tak2 lo, i ti refugee ” i tihna a mi?
India ram thenawm chiah i hnampui i chipuite awmna ram chanchin i hrechiang lo a va ang ve? Burma ram mipui ho turh nasa zia leh a biktakin Kawl[Bama]
Report this comment
March 13th, 2008 at 5:36 pm
ni lo leh Sipai lal vuangva nih lo tan chuan meidil a ni a. A tam zawk hi chu refugee an ni tih theih a ni! Khawvel mitam zawk pawn hriatpui a ni.
Burma mi Mizoram a foriegn case a an man look-up a thla-2, 3 vel rawn chhuak thenkhat chu, a hreawm leh hreawm loh an zawt a, [an awm na sipai hoin an duh2 an laksak leh rimtak an hlothlawh chhuahte duh2 hun a chhuh sak a, duhang ei tur poh nei loin an awm thin a] ” chhungkua a pem luh chi a ni!” ti tawk an awm ania. Mizoram mi in, tan in hlauh em2 pawh chhungkua a pem luh an chak chuan an dinhmuntur chu ngaituah ve tawh mai rawh rapthlak tak ani!!! Tun, a pawh mipui tikhawp a an phun ang chung a, kan Mizoram chhiat tawh zia leh inawpna diklo zia an sawi te hi chu Burmaram tuarhna 100 ah 10 pawh a tling lo ang!
Report this comment
March 13th, 2008 at 7:20 pm
@laimi and Vangchhia
The first link is a scholarly journal, the 2nd is a research done by Pan American Health Org.
https://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/82/1/265S
https://books.google.com/books?.....ehpUn36_Ds
Poverty leh obesity correlation chu a tam khawp mai. Under $20k per family chaw ei leh over $60k chaw ei a in ang em em lo.
Report this comment
March 13th, 2008 at 7:49 pm
Thirkut sawi hi dik na lai a awm. Reasons:
- retheih chuan chaw quality aiin quantity a poimoh. thil tlawm, filling si ei trawk theih an dap a. chu chu carbohydrates tam deuh a ni tlang pui ang ( white bread, cheap bakery products, cheap fast food etc).
- an hun tam zok hnahram thawh nan an hman vangin cooking an hman loh bakah an hah lutuk an cook peih lo.
Pu Vangchhia sawi pawh a dik. thatchhiat vang a ni thei. vegetables leh low-fat dairy products hi a hrisel a, a to ngai bok lo. tum tralh chuan hah leh time limit chung2 pawn a cook hman.
Bottom line: in dik ve ve.
PEACE
Report this comment
March 13th, 2008 at 9:42 pm
A inhnial lam pawh a ni lo ang chu….:P ka ziah hmasak ber ah khan, mi hausa neih ang a neih ve theih thu mahse a quality a in ang lo deuh tur thu kha ka ziak in ka hria. Mahse, thau vak/thauchhia hi retheih vang a ni kherlo ka ti tlat thung. Kan thawhpui kan pi pakhat pawh hi hausa lutuk an ni( a pasal milianair :P) junk food lo chu a ei tha duh thak lo, pound 360 vel a ni lauh mai. Mahni ei than /ei duh zawng vang te pawh a ni thei ti zawnga ziah ka tum, ka kal kual nasa lutuk a….kawng ka bo ta daih a nih kha
Report this comment
March 17th, 2008 at 1:16 am
aa.. India ram leh U.S chu compare phot lo mai ang u.
Mihausa ve ve kan compare anihchuan a awm, Mirethei ve ve kan compare leh chuan , Chapati, bawngek a ur a ei India ram a a million tel a la awm te leh, U.S a Chip, Junk food ei te kan compare leh zel a ngai dawn asin.
Vai ho pawh an thau em em hi, dul lawk tak tak, kawtthler a mu hmuh tur an tam e.
Jamu lam pang dep te va thleng tawh chuan in hre mai ang, South India lam chu a zia viau, Nort India lam kan thlir hian. Ngaih na awm thlawt rih lo ani.
Report this comment
March 28th, 2008 at 10:36 pm
zopatriot is absolutely correct. Theres no point to being a NASA scientist if you fail to help the poor of your own nation. Sujit Saraf was a NASA boy hes now a novelist…his picture on the back of THE PEACOCK THRONE, a book, shows him as a wealthy and privileged guy
Report this comment
June 26th, 2008 at 4:40 pm
Keipawh Indian ka ni lo a citizen chauh ka ni
Report this comment