Mizoram General Knowledge bu, Lalhmachhuana Zofa ziah ka chhiar a, ka rilru kap deuh hlek a rawn awm a; a dik ngei angem phei chu ka ti lova, amaherawhchu, ka ngaihdan chuan anih hmel fu mai. Lo chik ve teh u.
Mizoram Population ka en thla zai zai a, phek 4-na ah chuan Chhiarpui hmasa ber 1901 ah hian mihring 82,434 Mizoramah kan awm a. Chumi hnu chhiarpui 2- 1911,1921 ah hi chuan mihrin punna hi 10.6 leh 7.9 a ni a.
Chumi hnu atang chuan 20-30 a ni tlangpui a, 1961 ah 35.61 a lo ni a. 1971 ah chuan 24.93 ah a tlahniam leh ta a ni.
Ngaiteh 1981 chhiarpui a lo thleng a, mihring chu zaa 48.55 teh meuh maiin kan pung ta hluai mai. 1991 ah pawh zaa 39.7 in kan la pung fo. 2001 leh 2011 ah chuan 28.82 leh 22.78 chauhin kan pung leh si.
Helai 1971-1991 bawr velah hian thil felhlel chu a awm deuhin a hriat tlat mai. Heng hunlai hi lo chik mah teh, Mizoram buai avanga mihring kan buai hunlai ber a tih theih awm e. Khawkhawm nen, sipaiin buh leh bal, in leh lo an hal avangin khaw tam taka tam te a tla a; heng hunlai tak mai heti khawpa kan pung hi mak tak chu a ni.
Sipai sawn pai avanga heti taka kan pun chu a rinawm loh a; chutih laiin vai ho leh khasi an rawn pem lut vak em ni ang? Nge Burma lam atangin kan unaute an rawn pemthla chiam???
Thubelh-2011 census ah hian Lawngtlai leh Mamit hi 34.08% leh 36.59% in an pung bawk. District dang hi chu12%-25% in kan pung..????
Literacy rate ah pawh Lawngtlai leh Mamit hi 64.7 leh 79.1 an ni.
Buddhist hi 70,494 an awm a, Hindu hi a dawtah tam leh berin 31,562 an awm bawk.
Similar Posts:
- Census 2011 final report
- Mizoram Chhiarpui 2011 Result
- Mizoram Inter District U-19 Football Tournament 2012
- Chhiarpui neih mek pawm thei lote chungchang sawiho a ni
- Engtin nge ni dawn le?
November 19th, 2012 at 3:39 pm
# 100..
Ka’n comment ve reng reng te’ng.. Comment explosion atan..
(Joking ve tho, Jockey kekawrte ha chuang lem lovin..)
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 3:41 pm
@ Zualbonez: You can call it “intellectual growth” of the Chakmas of Mizoram. And, u should be thankful for contributions of Chakma commentators which enrich the misual.com , or else the debate and information remains “one-sided.”
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 3:43 pm
@ socialman, you are right. Let chemtatrawta come in debate without using any abnormal talk. He makes his comments only abusive languages. If you have guts Why don’t you CHEMTATRAWTA come in debate with rationalize data. Every comments you made were not ideological facts in related to CHAKMA.
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 3:49 pm
the canvas has been declared clean again for further discussion. I leave open the floor…
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 4:00 pm
I have a “Brahma Astra”. Do u know what it is? It is a sanskrit word. Wikipedia describes it as “it was considered the deadliest weapon. It was said that when the Brahmastra was discharged, there was neither a counter attack nor a defense that could stop it, except by Brahmadanda, a stick also created by Brahma. The Brahmastra never missed its mark and had to be used with very specific intent against an individual enemy or army, as the target would face complete annihilation.” If Chemtatrawta comes for debate, I might drop the “Brahma Astra” on him…Hahaha,…So, he should think carefully before he agrees to come to the debate..
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 4:10 pm
I believe that Chemtatrawta also has his ‘CHEMPUI’ aka DAO to counter your “Brahma Astra” socialman
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 4:15 pm
@ Zualbonez, I wouldn’t mind exporting you to BBC for their “Hard Talk” programme for your capability to moderate such explosive discussion, this one at misual.com is a classic example of your calibre & potential
In general Chakmas are ready to discuss and debate on any issues and in any platform. The discussion become meaningful when any arguments by posing or opposing party is backed by proper facts and data and on equal footings. It is waste of time when some arguments were put based on some general knowledge books or hearsay or based on popular opinion or based on unsubstantiated data and of course a little dose common sense. For example it is illogical to discuss Chakma Population growth or the percentage of it by putting data from unsubstantiated source and with prejudice mind. If one wants to discuss a True Analysis then one data needs to be compared with others. Such as if some members wants to analyse Chakma Population Growth, it must also present Mizo population growth, compare it and expose.
Abuse, Accuse, Violence are easy methods but wrong methods resulting in defeat.
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 4:22 pm
#106 @ zualbonez: interesting!
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 4:35 pm
And the greatest commandment said, “Love thy Neighbour as youself.”
Haih Jisssh
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 4:56 pm
inglit in in pawt vak² zel a sawitur ka hreve lo “Chakma Jindabad” han ti mai ilah.. Zualbonez hi eng hmeltak pu ang maw
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 5:01 pm
Mr. Socialman: Read and analyze all my comments carefully in all the post related to ethnic issue specially those related to the three ADCs… you will see what my principle really is, in this matter.
And mind you… figure for each year was taken as per the census of India by TRI, Aizawl Mizoram except 1986… The recorded data of 1986 was as per the record made by the CADC authority.
Myself didn’t made any critical analysis i just read what my friend had on his PhD thesis…
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 5:09 pm
@Ignatia: I do not know why figures of the same Census of India but available in various documents of Mizo scholars do not match. For example, you have referred to TRI Aizawl to say that Chakma population in 1951 Census was “11,435” but quoting from the same Census (1951), another Mizo has claimed that the Chakma population in 1951 was “15297” (see https://misual.life/2012/10/.....kma-te-hi/ ) . Which is the CORRECT census data??
That is why I stated that there is a tendency to misinterpret the data. Research must be objective, you know.
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 5:24 pm
@Ignatia, kindly post the India Census report (If you believe TRI has truly taken it from Census of India) of Chakmas and Mizos both, for a proper analysis to back your claim. Other wise your analysis & comments would stand bogus and malafide.
For your information, more than half of the Chakmas in Mizoram live outside CADC.
While I appreciate your friend’s effort to earn PhD but I am afraid if your friends earn it by wrong data & facts, it would amount to cheating. We would be glad to go through the thesis of your friend and see how authentic his /her Research are. Kindly do not take it as another Chakma-Mizo War…it is just that we do not need another wrong report being made right by a Doctorate thesis.
Report this comment
November 19th, 2012 at 5:26 pm
1941 Census data atangin Chakma foreinger ho hnawhchhuah chu a harsa vak dawn chuang hleinem. Lo tawng tir ve mai mai rawh u.
Report this comment
November 20th, 2012 at 9:17 am
@ Chemtatrawta: I draw your kind attention to # 99..
Report this comment
November 20th, 2012 at 12:02 pm
Socialman, awke… Draw more.
Report this comment
November 20th, 2012 at 12:18 pm
@ Chemtatrawta: This is now for you
I am surprised..First you accuse , then seek to run away when asked for a debate . An emblematic case of “Hit and run”.. This shows how weak are your defence..You can accuse without any accountability only when you argue amongst yourselves (Mizos) or not-so-knowledgeable Chakma.. You will fall flat before a tough guy, because the fundamentals of your arguments are too weak…. .hehehe…
Report this comment
November 20th, 2012 at 12:34 pm
hairehai.. socialchakma ve barh barh chu.. Hria chu i inti ve phian a ni maw?? Helai hmunah hian in duh dan dan hian a awm theih loh a, in dan anga inkhelh te in rawn sawi a, nuih chu i ti za pah pah mange. 1941 Census keu ngam ram hruaitu kan neih huna Bangladesh lama liam thla tur zingah i tel ve ngei anih hmel hi.
not-so-Knowledgeable?? saptawng te hi an hre nalh thei asin oo.. 
Report this comment
November 20th, 2012 at 1:12 pm
@ Chemtatrawta: Hairehai…
Why do you keep on repeating those stupid things but refuse to engage in a proper debate ??
Report this comment
November 20th, 2012 at 1:34 pm
chakma nge in duh samsung?
Report this comment
November 20th, 2012 at 1:59 pm
Chhangteval, Chakma nge i duh duichuani?? hairehai.. Chakma ho te hi chu an fing viau a maw, an fin hi a la tawi deuh e tih mai loh chu. An documents rawn tlangzarh ve teh fo te lah hi an han fabricate thei rem rem khawp a, an lo theihnghilh chang phei hi chuan ahnuaiah “Voice of Chakma” tih te an lo chhu tel kulh a.. In hrethiam ve mai tawh em?
Knowledgeable Socialchakma pawh a rawn pawr thar viau mai..hairehai..
Report this comment
November 20th, 2012 at 5:15 pm
@Chemtatrawta: This is for your spirit
Report this comment
November 20th, 2012 at 10:45 pm
paritchakmasocial…
super..hairehai… i va chak awm hrawt hrawt ve.. 
Ka lo ching phar nek dawn che mawni le.. 
Report this comment
November 21st, 2012 at 9:43 am
@ Chemtatrawta: paritchakmasocial??
And, once again 
from me for your refusal to debate but throw false information about Chakmas in public forum like misual.com..
Report this comment
November 21st, 2012 at 10:50 am
Inhau s’u… Tunlai sanah ui keh zawhte pawh an inkawmngeih tawh a nia..
Recent comments en chuan, ka sual hmel hle mai…
Report this comment